.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Monday, June 20, 2005

 

StumbleUpon

StumbleUpon is the greatest extension for Mozilla Firefox ever. Sick of going to the same websites day after day-StumbleUpon. Can’t google any good websites-StumbleUpon. Looking for the interesting side of the Internet-StumbleUpon. StumbleUpon is a random search engine powered by your interests and the interests of others. With a single click of the StumbleUpon toolbar, you can see a random website. Some are interesting and some are boring and you can vote with a thumbs up or down on the tool bar and then move on at your leisure. If you have Firefox and are connected to the Internet, go into Tools, then go to Extensions, and in the Extensions screen, click with the mouse pointer on the blue text at the bottom that says “Get More Extensions”. This will bring up the Extensions page and then you can just search this page for the StumbleUpon extension.

The following are a collection of Websites I have found with StumbleUpon:


Saturday, June 18, 2005

 

My Firefox Plug
Part 2: Firefox vs. IE

Firefox is the best browser that I have had the pleasure of using. It is such an innovation in the web browsing experience that it blows away the competition. In this part, I will talk about what really won me over.

First, I will cover why I turned away from Internet Explorer (IE). IE 6.0, with or without the XP Service Pack 2, is an aging piece of failing software. IE 6.0 was last truly updated in 2000 and it shows. The IE engine is slow to load and render webpages. Not only is it slow to render webpages, it can’t handle or support modern W3C standards for webpages like Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). Also IE offers an outdated Internet experience with the one webpage per browser window causing the Windows task bar to be filled up with open browser windows.

Furthermore, IE has ActiveX and Active Scripting, both of which create open hooks into your computer system for virus writers and adware/spyware creators to automatically download dangerous and disruptive programs into your system. This creates an unnecessary vulnerability in the system. To compound this vulnerability and add insult to injury, IE is not just integrated with the Windows operating system (OS), it is bolted to the Windows OS. To be integrated, the browser would work well with and share necessary information with the OS. But IE is bolted to the Windows OS, this means that the Windows OS can open IE and IE can open the Windows OS allowing any malice software that can hook into the Active X or Active Scripting in IE to directly attack the Windows OS. With all these flaws, US CERT, the American agency with Homeland Security, stated in June 2004 that it would be best to "use a different browser". This warning no longer applies to XP Service Pack 2 equipped PCs but any Windows-based PC that could not get XP Service Pack 2 should not go on the Internet with IE.

Microsoft still hasn’t improved its patching system. Microsoft has been known to test for six months after a flaw is found, security firms have to prod Microsoft to make patches by making public announcements about the flaw thus revealing the flaws existence to virus writers, and Microsoft waits to do patches in monthly cycles even if the patch is ready weeks before. Microsoft’s laissez-faire attitude to patches is dangerous in this on-demand, 24-7 world where virus writers never sleep.

So what does Firefox have that IE doesn’t? To answer in one word: Lots!

First, Firefox is a modern browser. It is continually updated and right now is at Version 1.0.4 with Version 1.1 set for June and versions 1.5 and 2.0 set for later this year and into next year. Firefox quickly loads and renders webpages. No waiting for Firefox as it zooms through the Internet without choking. Firefox also has a modern Internet experience with tabs. Allowing multiple webpages to be open in one browser window may not seem like much at first, but when you don’t have to go crawling through your task bar for the right browser window that has the webpage you’re interested in, life gets that much less complicated. Also, Firefox has a “find bar” instead of a “find window”. When you hit CTRL+F in IE the browsing experience stops as IE brings up a window in front of the browser for you to type in a word. When you hit CTRL+F in Firefox, a small bar opens up at the bottom of the tab and begins searching for the word as you type it in. Firefox is up on all the W3C standards and properly renders webpages.

Second, Firefox has great security. The Open Source movement, which the Mozilla Foundation is a part of, has never promised perfect security nor that their product will never be compromised by hackers and viruses. That said, Firefox has greater security than IE. Firefox doesn’t have ActiveX or Active Scripting and therefore can’t run any virus or adware/spyware that use ActiveX or Active Scripting (which most all do). Firefox is a separate program from the Windows OS, which means that malice programs can’t attack Windows through Firefox. Furthermore, the Mozilla Foundation usually puts out patches within one to two weeks of a flaw being found.

Third, Firefox is an open source product. Open source products allow anybody to view and work on the source code. This is different from a proprietary product like IE, which only allows Microsoft employees to view and work with the source code. While Microsoft only has so many employees working for it to create and repair IE’s source code, Mozilla has a whole world of volunteers to create and repair Firefox. This leads to many programmers not only improving the core code but also creating useful extensions to make Firefox more functional and interesting.


When all is said and done, Firefox blows IE out of the water in every way, shape, and form.

I have a Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird plug on my website at http://studentweb.uwstout.edu/gallistelk/mysite/firethunder.htm. I have a list of articles that might be of interest there.

Get Firefox!

 

My Firefox Plug
Part 1: My Browser Past

Firefox is the best browser that I have had the pleasure of using. Before I talk about Firefox, I would like to show that I’m not just dedicated to Firefox for its own sake and that I have been open minded with browsers. If you don’t care to hear about my history with browsers, just skip down to Part 2. First, I will give a little history of my use of browsers.

I started out using Netscape and at first it was good. Regrettably, this did not last. Netscape 4.7 was an embarrassment. It would freeze up the Internet connection so badly that I would have to restart the computer to reconnect to the Internet. To make matters worse, Netscape couldn’t really run Flash or Shockwave files even with a plug-in. Netscape apparently fixed that problem, but then became bloatware trying to package more and more into one system. The size and the glitches made Netscape too unbearable to use. I then switched to Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE). At first I didn’t want to as I didn’t and don’t have good luck with Microsoft products, but Internet Explorer 3.0/4.0 were excellent products. In fact, IE was such a good product that I used it up till March 2004.

Then I heard the former host of the late TechTV series “Call for Help” and “The Screen Savers”, Leo Laporte, talking about this cool new browser called the Mozilla Suite. The Mozilla Suite was made by the Mozilla Foundation from an open source version of Netscape code that Netscape released before AOL bought up the Netscape company. The Mozilla Suite was good, but not great. It was an all-in-one solution but that was also its shortfall. It was a web browser, but it had difficulty running Flash or Shockwave files. It was an email client, but it had to start everything besides the email client to run the email client. It had a chat client, but I don’t “do” chat. It had an HTML editor on it, but I didn’t see the need for one with so many other, separate programs out their. The Mozilla Suite was just bloatware with a browser attached. While on the Mozilla Foundation website I found Firefox.

At first I thought Firefox was just a browser-only version of the Mozilla Suite. Then I realized that Firefox had a different feel than the Mozilla Suite. It was sleeker and newer than the Mozilla Suite. Even though at the time Firefox was a beta at Version 0.7 and Mozilla Suite was at Version 1.5, Firefox was more functional and more versatile in its ability to play Flash and Shockwave files and Firefox could open and run more webpages than Mozilla Suite, especially Microsoft-proprietary webpages that were designed to be IE only. The Mozilla Suite felt like Netscape with less of the things that made Netscape bad, so I didn’t notice much difference between Mozilla Suite and IE. Firefox, on the other hand, was such a leap forward that I realized just how clunky and out-of-date IE was.

In Part 2, I will discuss what Firefox has that won me over.


Wednesday, June 15, 2005

 

Sorry for the lack of response…

but between the rash of strong thunderstorms in my area and having to do tech work on my computer in between them, I just haven’t had the time update either my website or my blog. I plan on making up for lost time this week.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?